حذف کلرید منیزیم توسط غشاهای نانوفیلتراسیون تهیه شده از نانوذرات اکسید مس

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشکده مهندسی شیمی، دانشکده فنی مهندسی، دانشگاه اراک، ایران

چکیده

در این تحقیق ابتدا نانوذرات مس اکسید تک ‌ظرفیتی به‌روش الکتروشیمیایی سنتز شدند و از نانوذرات سنتز شده برای اصلاح و ساخت غشاهای نانوفیلتراسیون بر پایه پلی‌اترسولفون استفاده شد. غلظت‌های مختلفی از نانوذرات مس اکسید تک ‌ظرفیتی به‌عنوان افزودنی در پلی‌اترسولفون به‌عنوان ماتریس غشایی جهت تهیه غشاهای نانوفیلتراسیون PES/Cu2O  مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. غشاهای تهیه شده توسط تبدیل فوریه فروسرخ (FT-IR) و میکروسکوپ الکترونی روبشی (SEM) آنالیز شدند. تجزیه و تحلیل FTIR تشکیل پیوندهای مطلوب را در نانوذرات سنتزی مس اکسید تک‌ظرفیتی و غشاهای ساخته شده، نشان داد. عملکرد جداسازی غشاهای ساخته ‌شده با شار آب خالص و پس‌دهی کلرید منیزیم مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج بالاترین شار آب خالص L/m2h 78/36 را برای غشای ساخته‌شده M1 در 05/0% وزنی نانوذرات Cu2O نشان داد. علاوه‌بر این، بالاترین میزان پس‌دهی MgCl2 72% در 2% وزنی نانوذرات مس اکسید تک ‌ظرفیتی برای غشای ساخته ‌شده M5 گزارش شد.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Magnesium Chloride Removal by Nanofiltration Membranes Prepared from Cuprous Oxide Nanoparticles

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shakiba Ghohyei
  • Abdolreza Moghadassi
  • Samaneh Bandehali
  • Morteza Habibi
  • Maryam Eskandari
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Arak University, Iran
چکیده [English]

In this study, Cu2O nanoparticles were first synthesized electrochemically, and the synthesized nanoparticles were used to modify nanofiltration membranes.  Different concentrations of nanoparticles were included as an additive in PES as a membrane matrix for the preparation of PES/Cu2O nanofiltration membranes. The prepared membranes were analyzed by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM). FTIR analysis showed the formation of favorable bonds in the synthesized nanoparticles and prepared membranes.  The separation performance of membranes was investigated with pure water flux and MgCl2 removal.  The results showed the highest pure water flux of 36.78 L/m2h for M1 at 0.05 wt.% Cu2O nanoparticles. In addition, the MgCl2 rejection increased to 72% at 2 wt.% Cu2O nanoparticles for M5.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Membrane
  • Nanofiltration
  • Magnesium Chloride Removal
  • Copper Oxide Nanoparticles
  • Modification Methods
[1]. Bandehali S, Parvizian F, Ruan H, Moghadassi A, Shen J, Figoli A, Adeleye A S, Hilal N, Matsuura T, Drioli E (2021) A planned review on designing of high-performance nanocomposite nanofiltration membranes for pollutants removal from water, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 78-125. ##
[2]. Van der Bruggen B, Vandecasteele C (2003) Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration: overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry, Environmental pollution, 435-445. ##
[3]. Yaser A Z (2011) Development of integrated nanofiltration system for highly concentrated dye removal, Doctoral dissertation, Swansea University, 1-79. ##
[4]. Staude E (1992) Marcel mulder: basic principles of membrane technology, kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 96: 741-742. ##
[5]. Mulder J (2012) Basic principles of membrane technology, Springer Science and Business Media. ##
[6]. García A, Rodríguez B, Oztürk D, Rosales M, Diaz D, Mautner A (2018) Incorporation of CuO nanoparticles into thin-film composite reverse osmosis membranes (TFC-RO) for antibiofouling properties, Polymer Bulletin, 75: 2053-2069. ##
[7]. Hosseini S, Afshari M, Fazlali A, Farahani S K, Bandehali S, Van der Bruggen B, Bagheripour E (2019) Mixed matrix PES-based nanofiltration membrane decorated by (Fe3O4–polyvinylpyrrolidone) composite nanoparticles with intensified antifouling and separation characteristics, Chemical Engineering Research Design, 147: 390-398. ##
[8]. Hwang J, Ejsmont A, Freund R, Goscianska J, Schmidt B V, Wuttke S (2020) Controlling the morphology of metal–organic frameworks and porous carbon materials: Metal oxides as primary architecture-directing agents, Chemical Society Reviews, 3348-3422. ##
[9]. Hashmi M, Ullah S, Kim I S (2019) Copper oxide (CuO) loaded polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofiber membranes for antimicrobial breath mask applications, Current Research in Biotechnology, 1-10. ##
[10]. Zhou H, Kang L, Zhou M, Zhong Z, Xing W (2018) Membrane enhanced COD degradation of pulp wastewater using Cu2O/H2O2 heterogeneous Fenton process, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 26, 9: 1896-1903. ##
[11]. Zareei F, Hosseini S M (2019) A new type of polyethersulfone based composite nanofiltration membrane decorated by cobalt ferrite-copper oxide nanoparticles with enhanced performance and antifouling property, Separation Purification Technology, 226: 48-58. ##
[12]. Singh R, Yadav V, Purkait M K (2019) Cu2O photocatalyst modified antifouling polysulfone mixed matrix membrane for ultrafiltration of protein and visible light driven photocatalytic pharmaceutical removal, Separation Purification Technology, 212: 191-204. ##
[13]. Xu Z, Ye S, Zhang G, Li W, Gao C, Shen C, Meng Q (2016) Antimicrobial polysulfone blended ultrafiltration membranes prepared with Ag/Cu2O hybrid nanowires, Journal of Membrane Science, 509: 83-93. ##
[14]. Nasrollahi N, Vatanpour V, Aber S, Mahmoodi N M (2018) Preparation and characterization of a novel polyethersulfone (PES) ultrafiltration membrane modified with a CuO/ZnO nanocomposite to improve permeability and antifouling properties, Separation and Purification Technology 192: 369-382. ##
[15]. Yang H, Ouyang J, Tang A, Xiao Y, Li X, Dong X, Yu Y (2006) Electrochemical synthesis and photocatalytic property of cuprous oxide nanoparticles, Materials Research Bulletin, 1310-1318. ##
[16]. Valodkar M, Pal A, Thakore S (2011) Synthesis and characterization of cuprous oxide dendrites: New simplified green hydrothermal route, Alloys Compounds, 523-528. ##
[17]. Khattar H K, Al-Hasnawi S W R, Al-Saady F A (2015) Electrolytic prepa-ration and characterization of cuprous oxide nano powder, International Journal of Electrical Computer Sciences IJECS-IJENS, 6-12. ##
[18]. Sachin S S, Ashok D B, Chandrashekhar M M (2016) Synthesis of cuprous oxide (Cu2O) nanoparticles–a review, Journal Of Nano- And Electronic Physics, 8, (8, № 1): 01035-1-01035-5. ##
[19]. Saeednia S, Iranmanesh P, Hatefi A M, Sinaei S (2015) Synthesis of cuprous oxide by thermal treatment in liquid paraffin. nanostructures, 5, 3: 297-303. ##
[20]. Ji J, Cooper W (1990) Electrochemical preparation of cuprous oxide powder: Part I. Basic electrochemistry, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 20, 5: 818-825. ##
[21]. Zhang N, Du Y L, Zhang Y, Wang C M (2011) A simple method for controlling the type of cuprous oxide semiconductors using different surfactants, Journal of Materials Chemistry, 21, 14: 5408-5413. ##
[22]. Valodkar M, Pal A, Thakore S (2011) Synthesis and characterization of cuprous oxide dendrites: New simplified green hydrothermal route, Alloys Compounds, 509, 2: 523-528. ##
[23]. Sandhya S U, Nityananda S A (2013) A facile one step solution route to synthesize cuprous oxide nanofluid, NanomaterialsNanotechnology, 3: 5. ##
[24]. Ji J, Cooper W C (1990) Electrochemical preparation of cuprous oxid powder: Part II. Process conditions, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 20, 5: 826-834. ##
[25]. Hwang G J, Ohya H, Nagai T (1999) Ion exchange membrane based on block copolymers, Part III: preparation of cation exchange membrane, Membrane Science, 156, 1: 61-65. ##
[26]. Khan J, Tripathi B P, Saxena A, Shahi V K (2007) Electrochemical membrane reactor: In situ separation and recovery of chromic acid and metal ions, Electrochimica Acta, 52, 24: 6719-6727. ##
[27]. Ghaemi N, Madaeni S S, Daraei P, Rajabi H, Shojaeimehr T, Rahimpour F, Shirvani B (2015) PES mixed matrix nanofiltration membrane embedded with polymer wrapped MWCNT: Fabrication and performance optimization in dye removal by RSM, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 298: 111-121. ##
[28]. Safarpour M, Vatanpour V, Khataee A (2016) Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide/TiO2 blended PES nanofiltration membrane with improved antifouling and separation performance, Desalination, 393: 65-78. ##
[29]. Hu, L., et al., 2012. Preparation and performance of novel thermally stable polyamide/PPENK composite nanofiltration membranes. Applied Surface Science, 258(22): pp. 9047-9053. ##
[30]. Sivakumar, M., et al., 1998. Modification of cellulose acetate: Its characterization and application as an ultrafiltration membrane. applied polymer science, 67(11): pp. 1939-1946. ##
[31]. Gholami A, Moghadassi A R, Hosseini S M, Shabani S, Gholami F (2014) Preparation and characterization of polyvinyl chloride-based nanocomposite nanofiltration-membrane modified by iron oxide nanoparticles for lead removal from water, Industrial Engineering Chemistry, 20, 4: 1517-1522. ##
[32]. Rajesh S, Senthilkumar S, Jayalakshmi A, Nirmala M T, Ismail A F, Mohan D (2013) Preparation and performance evaluation of poly (amide–imide) and TiO2 nanoparticles impregnated polysulfone nanofiltration membranes in the removal of humic substances, Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering Aspects, 418: 92-104. ##
[33]. Chang X, Wang Z, Quan S, Xu Y, Jiang Z, Shao L (2014) Exploring the synergetic effects of graphene oxide (GO) and polyvinylpyrrodione (PVP) on poly (vinylylidenefluoride)(PVDF) ultrafiltration membrane performance, Applied Surface Science, 316: 537-548. ##
[34]. Nasrollahi N, Atanpour V, Aber S, Mahmoodi N M (2017) Preparation and characterization of a novel polyethersulfone (PES) ultrafiltration membrane modified with a CuO/ZnO nanocomposite to improve permeability and antifouling properties, Separation and Purification Technology, 192: 369-382. ##
[35]. Abdul Mannan H, Mukhtar H, Shima Shaharun M, Roslee Othman M, Murugesan T (2016) Polysulfone/poly (ether sulfone) blended membranes for CO2 separation, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 133: 5. ##
[36]. Bandehali S, Parvizian F, Moghadassi A, Hosseini S M (2019) High water permeable PEI nanofiltration membrane modified by L-cysteine functionalized POSS nanoparticles with promoted antifouling/separation performance, Separation Purification Technology, 237: 116361. ##
[37]. Bagheripour E, Moghadassi A, Hosseini S M (2016) Preparation of mixed matrix PES-based nanofiltration membrane filled with PANI-co-MWCNT composite nanoparticles, Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 33, 4: 1462-1471. ##
[38]. Bandehali S, Moghadassi A, Parvizian F, Hosseini S (2019) A new type of [PEI-glycidyl POSS] nanofiltration membrane with enhanced separation and antifouling performance, Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 36, 10: 1657-1668. ##
[39]. Mansourpanah Y,  Madaeni S S, Rahimpour A, Adeli M, Hashemi M Y, Moradian M R (2011) Fabrication new PES-based mixed matrix nanocomposite membranes using polycaprolactone modified carbon nanotubes as the additive: property changes and morphological studies, Desalination, 277, 1-3: 171-177. ##
[40]. Sivakumar M, Mohan D R, Rangarajan R (2006) Studies on cellulose acetate-polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes: II. Effect of additive concentration, Membrane Science, 268, 2: 208-219. ##
[41]. Hosseini S, Afshari M, Fazlali A R, Farahani S K, Bandehali S, Van der Bruggen B, Bagheripour E (2019) Mixed matrix PES-based nanofiltration membrane decorated by (Fe3O4–polyvi nylpyrrolidone) composite nanoparticles with intensified antifouling and separation characteristics, Chemical Engineering Research Design, 147: 390-398. ##
[42]. Bagheripour E, Moghadassi A R, Hosseini S M, Van der Bruggen B, Parvizian F (2018) Novel composite graphene oxide/chitosan nanoplates incorporated into PES based nanofiltration membrane: chromium removal and antifouling enhancement, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 62: 311-320. ##
[43]. Sianipar M, Kim S H, Iskandar F, Wenten I G (2017) Functionalized carbon nanotube (CNT) membrane: progress and challenges, RSC Advances, 7, 81: 51175-51198. ##
[44]. Ghaemi N, Madaeni S S, Alizadeh A, Rajabi H, Daraei P (2011) Preparation, characterization and performance of polyethersulfone/organically modified montmorillonite nanocomposite membranes in removal of pesticides, Journal of Membrane Science, 382, 1-2: 135-147. ##
[45]. He Y, Tang Y P, Chung T S (2016) Concurrent removal of selenium and arsenic from water using polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)–polyamide thin-film nanocomposite nanofiltration membranes, Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research, 55, 50: 12929-12938. ##
[46]. Zhao Y, Yuan Q (2006) A comparison of nanofiltration with aqueous and organic solvents, Journal of membrane Science, 279, 1-2: 453-458. ##
[47]. Ghaemi N, Madaeni S S, Alizadeh A, Daraei P, Vatanpour V, Falsafi M (2012) Fabrication of cellulose acetate/sodium dodecyl sulfate nanofiltration membrane: characterization and performance in rejection of pesticides, Desalination, 290: 99-106. ##
[48]. Gueye M, Richardson Y, Kafack F T, Blin J (2014) High efficiency activated carbons from African biomass residues for the removal of chromium (VI) from wastewater, Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2, 1: 273-281. ##
[49]. Hosseini S, Ebrahimi M, Khodabakhshi A, Nemati M, Askari M (2019) Fabrication of mixed matrix ion exchange membrane by using activated carbon nanoparticles modified by chitosan: investigation of electrolyte concentration and ph effects on transfer properties, Journal of Petroleum Research, 29, 98-2: 72-83.‏ ##
[50]. Fan L, Luo C, Sun M, Li X, Qiu H (2013) Highly selective adsorption of lead ions by water-dispersible magnetic chitosan/graphene oxide composites, Colloids Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 103: 523-529. ##
[51]. Kyzas G Z, Kostoglou M, Lazaridis N K (2009) Copper and chromium (VI) removal by chitosan derivatives—Equilibrium and kinetic studies, Chemical Engineering Journal, 152, 2-3: 440-448. ##
[52]. Bandehali S, Moghadassi A, Parvizian F, Hosseini S M (2020) Mprovement in separation performance of PEI-based nanofiltration membrane by using functionalized titanium dioxide nanoparticles, Journal of Petroleum Research, 29, 109: 108-119.‏ ##